When a deal breaks, the terms already know what to do.
Most terms describe what each side will do. The dispute terms describe what happens when something goes wrong, and they live in the same body as everything else. So when a fight starts, there is no seam to argue about. The same definitions and the same ladder that governed the deal govern the dispute.
The resolution ladder
You climb only as far as you need to. Each rung is meant to settle the matter before the next, more expensive one is reached. A small, clear-cut issue should never need a courtroom.
Self-executing remedies
Live todayWhere the order defines a clear consequence for a defined event, the remedy simply applies. Both sides agreed it in advance, so nobody renegotiates it.
Agent settlement, within range
RoadmapFor matters that need a number, each side's agent can propose and accept a settlement, but only inside the bounds the principals set. Defined in the standard today.
Human-confirmed arbitration
Live todayIf settlement does not land, the matter goes to arbitration under a published ruleset, and a human confirms the result before it binds. This produces a real award.
Courts
Live todayThe final backstop. Seat and governing law are fixed by the order, so everyone already knows which court and which law apply.
Designed to connect to your ADR
onTerms does not ask you to abandon the dispute-resolution relationships you already have. The standard is designed so an external ADR provider will be able to plug into the arbitration rung, using the same case-file standard as its input. onTerms supplies the standardized terms and the verifiable record. The provider you already trust supplies the forum. This connection is on the roadmap, not live yet.